The display of our statistical information online is quite different from that of our external "audit sheet" which is detailed below.
First Nomination
Subsequent nominations
Initial determination of teaching and learning.
Reviewers score sheets received
Judges determination received
Initial permission requested from honoree.
Second permission request
Third and final permission request and notification of decline.
Updating and publication
Honoree notification and award presentation.
For our on line statistical purposes we have included only an applicant as one which has one or more nominations and has followed our submission policy. The requirement of a second nomination has been brought to the attention of a nominee.
After a second nomination is received, the next three steps are completed within two weeks at which time we request permission to list the honoree and provide a laudation for publication. Since the process is so short, neither nominees or ourselves feel that a status of applicants other than what we currently publish is necessary in our particular AP. All applicants, whether successful or not are contacted. In the event that the review process takes over two weeks, all applicants are notified as to the probable completion date of the application.
From 1998 through 1999 the award was listed in a number of award submission ventures but due to the lack of quality sites being submitted, these venues were not pursued after that period.
We work with all valid applications to expand, correct and enhance their creations so that they may eventually qualify and have our judges review their applications. The requirement to have two nominations with citations encourages quality submissions and those who honestly wish to improve their web sites and work toward accessibility compliance.
Current year statistics are updated at the end of a monthly period.
We do not include a current status of our review in progress because of privacy purpose considerations.
| Prior Year Stats | Applied | Honoree's | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | 158 | 50 | 0 |
| 1999 | 215 | 105 | 0 |
| 2000 | 45 | 21 | 0 |
| 2001 | 38 | 32 | 0 |
| 2002 | 21 | 17 | 0 |
| 2003 | 137 | 46 | 0 |
| 2004 | 160 | 53 | 4 |
| 2005 | 29 | 24 | 1 (Note 1) |
| 2006 | 66 | 59 | 8 |
| 2007 | 150 | 36 | 11 |
| 2008 | 159 | 35 | 8 |
| 2009 | 42 | 25 | 3 |
| Current Year Stats | Applied | Honoree's | Pending |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21001 | 8 | 3 | 4 |
| 21002 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| 21003 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| 21004 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
| 21005 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| 21006 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 21007 | 8 | 4 | 3 |
| 21008 | 3 | 1 | 2 |
| 21009 | |||
| 21010 | |||
| 21011 | |||
| 21012 | |||
| 2010 Cumulative Through 21008 | 48 | 12 |
Pending: One or more of the following is incomplete at the end of a period. Those who applied are included in pending which is detailed below.
Working with applicant to achieve the required 23 or more score, awaiting correction of DQ items and so forth and awaiting a second nomination.
Reviewers comments and scoring has not been received.
Judges determination has not been received.
Preliminary review not complete as to teaching and learning content.
Note 1: Eight applicants purged in 2509 because only one nomination has been received within the past six months. After that date applicants we include in the statistics, have begun the formal review process (two or more nominations).
Copyright: 1986-2010